TPDK is anti-India,anti-Hindu
For once the masks are off, and that is good.Thanthai Periyar
Dravida Kazhagam (TPDK) is not against just Hindutva, but
against Hindu religion as well as India. Its president wants
both to be destroyed and eliminated.Could it be a case of
distortion or false news. I dont think so as it has appeared in
their own official magazine.
If you read the speech you may notice that there are many false
statements. To me that is not the major issue. The issue is this-
he has come out categorically against india and hindu religion.
Why this opposition to both. The roots can be traced to Periyar.
According to S.V.Rajadurai till he breathed his last Periyar did
not give up the idea of a separate nation , carved out of India.
Periyar was no fan of Hindu religion. He encouraged conversion
to Islam and found fault with Christianity and Buddhism. For
him converting to Islam is the best option. He also wrote that
for the elimation of caste system hindu religion should be abolished.
So it is no wonder that Mani also speaks on similar lines. Periyar,
as far as I know, did not want destruction of India but only a nation
for the dravidas. But Mani wants both - destruction of the religion
as well as the nation.
Anyway one should be grateful to Mani for making this crystal clear.
There is no beating around the bush. It is not a question of destroying
Hindutva alone. For him the real targets should be India and Hindu religion.
So next time when any of the Periyarties or their fellow travellers
oppose Hindutva dont be mislead by assuming that it is a part of
secular agenda. The real agenda has been spelt out now.
Anyway dont expect that his speech will be condemned by the so
called progressive, rationalist, secular intellectuals in Tamil Nadu.
Because in these days most of them think that nationalism, patriotism,
nation are all bad words as far as they apply to India.
Dravida Kazhagam (TPDK) is not against just Hindutva, but
against Hindu religion as well as India. Its president wants
both to be destroyed and eliminated.Could it be a case of
distortion or false news. I dont think so as it has appeared in
their own official magazine.
If you read the speech you may notice that there are many false
statements. To me that is not the major issue. The issue is this-
he has come out categorically against india and hindu religion.
Why this opposition to both. The roots can be traced to Periyar.
According to S.V.Rajadurai till he breathed his last Periyar did
not give up the idea of a separate nation , carved out of India.
Periyar was no fan of Hindu religion. He encouraged conversion
to Islam and found fault with Christianity and Buddhism. For
him converting to Islam is the best option. He also wrote that
for the elimation of caste system hindu religion should be abolished.
So it is no wonder that Mani also speaks on similar lines. Periyar,
as far as I know, did not want destruction of India but only a nation
for the dravidas. But Mani wants both - destruction of the religion
as well as the nation.
Anyway one should be grateful to Mani for making this crystal clear.
There is no beating around the bush. It is not a question of destroying
Hindutva alone. For him the real targets should be India and Hindu religion.
So next time when any of the Periyarties or their fellow travellers
oppose Hindutva dont be mislead by assuming that it is a part of
secular agenda. The real agenda has been spelt out now.
Anyway dont expect that his speech will be condemned by the so
called progressive, rationalist, secular intellectuals in Tamil Nadu.
Because in these days most of them think that nationalism, patriotism,
nation are all bad words as far as they apply to India.
Thanthai periyar was a very great patriot. Nobody in Tamil Nadu is against India and Hindu religion. You are scared, you know that thanthai periyar ideas would wake all the indian people up and you will be nowhere with all your caste and god shit... You are talking about Hindu, Hindu, Hindu... who is hindu? do you have a definition? or does our indian government has a definition? you know nothing about constitution and the definition of Hindu. Dr B. R. Ambedkar was a Hindu when he wrote the constitution of India. He provided the definition for Hindu as "One who doesn't belong to Muslim, christion, sikh...etc is a hindu"... so no solid definition for Hindu... please try to understand, criticizing someone is very easy and simple, but learning from them is very difficult because all your people are cheaters, slowly you guys will sell India, but you will say that thanthai periyar did everything... rubbish...
please, try to understand his thoughts.
Tamil
Posted by Anonymous | Wednesday, July 12, 2006 2:52:00 PM
Guy above,
Have you heard about something called the Supreme Court. Read up a little on what it says about Hinduism in some of it's judgements.
...and we have to take Ambedkar's view on Hinduism!!! LOL.
And yes, most Dalit organizations are anti-Hindu and are funded by foreign missionary organzations. And some are also blatantly anti-national : like the TPDK mentioned in this excellent post.
Get out of the hate/chauvinistic mode. Will not do you or the nation any good.
Posted by Sharan Sharma | Friday, July 14, 2006 10:06:00 PM